My Life and Welcome To It!

Musing of a Middle-aged Teenager

Archive for the 'Life' Category

The Golden Age of Hollywood

According to many experts and people the golden era of Hollywood was during 1930’s and 1940’s when the industry was thriving. But many experts agree that although 30’s brought in the commercial success but the actual golden age from artistic point of view began in 1920s itself when it drew talent from all over the world. Before this period Hollywood was just like any other film making locations but it was after First World War that it created a niche for itself in the world. The obvious reason was the magnitude of damage the European countries suffered in the World War and subsequent economic hardships faced by them thus affecting the film industry. Before the advent of Hollywood as a top destination Germany was the most popular destination known for its artistic excellence. America benefited from the fact that it suffered relatively less casualties and loss of property compared to European Nations.

The popular names during the Golden Era were Clark Cable, Bette Davis, Charlie Chaplin, Bing Crosby, Spencer Tracy, Bob Hope, Ingrid, Judy Garland, Bergman, James Cagney, Jennifer Jones, Ronald Reagan, Elizabeth Taylor and Cary Gran, the list is endless. These actors became the house hold names throughout the country in 1930’s and 1940’s. The film industry during this era was so wealthy and powerful that studios like Paramount, MGM, Universal, 20th Century Fox and RKO kept adding more buildings to their studios. More than 7,000 films were released by these studios during the period of 1930’s and 1940’s. More than 75 million people flocked to see at least one film in a week during the peak years of Hollywood.

Also during this era the nation saw threats due to Second World War. When soon this threat turned into reality the presidents of these studios took this as an opportunity to make films that would bond countrymen together during these tough and dreadful years. They made many patriotic movies involving actors like Betty Grable and Van Johnson. These movies in a way also helped the war efforts. Apart from the movies there were numerous short films and documentaries made.

Some of the famous movies of the golden era include Memphis Belle: A Story of a Flying Fortress directed by William Wyler, Howard Hawks directed movies Sergeant York, To Have and Have Not. The commonality among all the movies of golden era was that almost all the movies ended on a happy note and patriotic ardor, which was liked by the people also. The movies made during the 1940’s are referred to as “film noir” which in the literary context means “dark films”. The movies were mostly pessimistic with tough male protagonist who was also a cynic and female protagonist would be attractive woman leading the males to a disastrous situation. Few examples of the Film Noir are Stranger on the Third Floor directed by Boris Ingster, High Sierra directed by Raoul Walsh, Shadow of a Doubt directed by Alfred Hitchcock and The Maltese Falcon directed by John Huston.

The comedies were also popular during that era, the main feature of the comedies were duos forming during this period. Some of the famous duos of actors were Bob Hope and Bing Crosby famous for their movie Road to Singapore, Abbott and Costello, Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn, and Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis. The movies that portrayed the lives of the westerns during the era were also popular with the people some of the examples being Fort Apache and She wore a Yellow Ribbon. But by the time these movies were released the downfall of the Hollywood has already begun due to the effects of the war, depression and arrival of television only to be not able to recover again.

posted by Tom Gardner in Life and have No Comments

U.S. Sues AT&T for Age Discrimination

As many of you know, I retired from AT&T in 2008 and have been trying to find a job. I apply and apply and cannot seem to get a call back. I’ve even tried to get rehired at AT&T. I have been wondering why this is happening and after reading the following article I think I may have found the answer.

By Jonathan Stempel — Thursday August 20th 2009

NEW YORK (Reuters) – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued AT&T Inc on Thursday, accusing the nation’s largest phone company of discriminating against workers over 40.

In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the EEOC said Dallas-based AT&T had “no legitimate business or reason” for its nationwide policy not to rehire employees who had retired under various retirement and severance programs.

The EEOC said tens of thousands of retirees covered by the programs, including a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program and an Enhanced Pension and Retirement Program, are harmed by the policy, which it said took effect in October 2006.

“From what AT&T has told us, there are in excess of 50,000 individuals subject to these plans,” said Louis Graziano, an EEOC lawyer handling the case, in an interview. “At most, very few people under 40 would be affected.”

Graziano said that for many years prior to 2006, the programs let retirees reapply for jobs after a six-month waiting period. The current AT&T was created in 2005 when SBC Communications Inc bought what had been AT&T Corp.

Marty Richter, an AT&T spokesman, declined to comment on the lawsuit. He said the phone company makes diversity a top priority, and that discrimination of any sort, including on the basis of age, “is not tolerated.”

AT&T employs 294,600 people, according to its website.

The EEOC is seeking the rehiring of and payment of back wages to affected employees, an injunction against further discrimination, and other remedies.

It brought the case on behalf of John Yates, who was 57 years old when AT&T turned him down for employment.

Yates could not immediately be reached for comment.

The EEOC filed a similar federal case in Missouri against a unit of the insurer Allstate Corp in 2004. That case is still ongoing.

Now my wife showed me the article when I went to visit her for lunch last week and I started to do some investigating. Another website I found information at was Lawmemo.com and it contained the EEOC’s press release wich follows:

EEOC v. At&T class action for age discrimination
August 20, 2009 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Today EEOC filed a class action suit against AT&T, Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries alleging age discrimination.

The basic claim: AT&T discriminated against a class of retired AT&T workers by denying them the ability for reemployment solely because they retired under early retirement plans including the Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program (VRIP), the Enhanced Pension and Retirement Program (EPR) or other retirement plan.

The EEOC press release:

NEW YORK – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed an age discrimination lawsuit against AT&T, Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries, the agency announced today. The EEOC charged that AT&T discriminated against a class of retired AT&T workers by denying them the ability for reemployment solely because they retired under early retirement plans including the Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program (VRIP), the Enhanced Pension and Retirement Program (EPR) or other retirement plan. The effect of this denial of reemployment results in a disproportionate number of older workers not having the same opportunity to apply for reemployment, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, Case No. 09 Civ 7323, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, John Yates, who filed the discrimination charge with the EEOC, and a class of other retired AT&T workers, are denied reemployment because they had participated in the VRIP, EPR or other retirement program. Yates and all other retirees who are age 40 or older are protected by law from discrimination because of their age. The result of AT&T’s policy is to exclude this class of older workers because of their age from being reemployed by AT&T regardless of their qualifications. This violation has been ongoing since at least October 1, 2006, the EEOC said.

“We’ve been taking a new and hard look at age discrimination recently, and we’re intent on enforcing the ADEA strategically and vigorously,” said EEOC Acting Chairman Stuart J. Ishimaru. “This particular case highlights the Commission’s commitment to combating age-based disparate impact discrimination.”

EEOC Trial Attorney Louis Graziano said, “Federal law prohibits employers from instituting policies that adversely affect workers because of their age. AT&T’s policy has that effect.”

EEOC New York District Director Spencer H. Lewis added, “All employees, regardless of their age, should be permitted to complete for jobs equally. That is the fundamental right that the ADEA grants to older workers. We hope this lawsuit sends a message to such employers that the EEOC will seek relief when it finds the law has been violated.”

According to company information, Dallas-based AT&T is the largest telecommunications company in the world by revenue, with more than $124 billion in 2008.

In July of this year the EEOC held a public hearing on recent developments in age discrimination, including the effect on older workers of widespread layoffs, threats to employee benefits and controversial recent court decisions. The Commission also issued a technical assistance document on waivers of discrimination claims as part of severance agreements. Further information is available at http://www.eeoc.gov/press/7-15-09.html and http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_severance-agreements.html.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

A copy of the filing can be downloaded here.

posted by Tom Gardner in Life and have No Comments

Separation of church and state in the United States

Before anybody gets in an uproar over this post, read through it carefully. I am all for the constitutional meaning of the separation of church and state which states in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it state the words “Separation of Church and State”, the amendment give all Americans the right to choose what religion they want to be part of, Be it Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim or any other religion.

In my opinion, the First Amendment is the single most important part of the Constitution. It protects some of the most basic human rights and reflects a view of the dangerous places government might tread.  Some of the first colonists of the nation for which the Constitution was written had been seeking to escape religious persecution. The constitutions of several of the states prohibited public support of religion (though some did explicitly support or demand adherence to Christianity). Above all, the many varying sects of Christianity in America required that to be fair to all, there could be preference to none. It would have been disgraceful for anyone to wish to leave the United States because of religious persecution. So the authors decided it best to keep the government out of religion. This is not to say that the United States was not or is not a religious nation. Religion plays a big role in the everyday life of Americans, then and now. But what the authors were striving for is tolerance… something I fear contemporary Americans are lacking.

So while we all are debating over should prayer be allowed in schools or before a city council meeting, maybe those who are saying we should not have it should read the constitution more fully and not try to dictate their beliefs on everyone, just as those religious fanatics should not try to fore their view on those that do not agree with them.

That’s all I have to say at this time. Any comments will be looked at and are appreciated.

posted by Tom Gardner in Life and have No Comments

Was I Wrong or Did I Do The Right Thing?

I had an interesting experience yesterday. I the midst of packing up the house for the move to the new house our doorbell rang. Answering the door, I find a young woman, about the same age as my youngest, asking if she can use the phone. Her story was that she had a fight with her boyfriend and was left here in Tracy. All she had was her purse and a jacket. I let her use the phone and after dialing 4 different numbers and not getting an answer, I asked her if she needed a ride home. She told me she did not live in Tracy but in Valley Springs about an hour away. I asked her to wait while I put on some shoes and got my truck keys and I would take her home. She offered me $10.00 for gas which I refused. I told my wife goodbye and that I would call her after I dropped the young woman off and was on my way home.

The ride went off without a hitch and we got to Valley Springs without an incident. I dropped her off at her apartment and headed home, calling my wife before I left. I got home without incident and that’s where the pondering started.

I have been called too trusting and told I don’t think about my actions. In this day and age, I do realize I should what with all the gang violence and not knowing a person. Maybe I am too trusting, but maybe the rest of the world is too cynical. I did what I did because that is the way I was raised. The rules to live by, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” the Golden Rule. “Do a good deed daily,” the Boy Scout motto. And “Help those when you can,” my own take on both of those rules

They say that chivalry is dead. If that is the case then that is do to the fact that society today has killed it. In the Code of Chivalry it mentions helping those less fortunate than yourself. But what is lee fortunate? I think being stranded an hours drive from home is unfortunate, and I did what I thought a Good Christian Man would do, I offered to take the person home. My decisions were based on these things.

  1. What if it had been my daughter?
  2. What if it had been my wife?
  3. What if it had been me?

We as a society cannot afford to be cautious of every stranger that rings our doorbell. We need to treat each other as brothers and sisters and not think of the bad that can happen but of all the good too.

If you agree with me or even if you don’t your comments would be appreciated.

posted by Tom Gardner in Life and have Comments Off

Why I think I am the Way I Am

Life is tough. I spent the first 47 years of my life as an overweight and shy guy. I was what some of you would call a loner. I did not want to associate with anyone and wanted to be by myself. Part of it was due to a lack of confidence in myself. Another part was the fact that I would go through bouts of depression. The depression wasn’t so severe that I could not bounce back, it was just feeling sorry for myself. I never contemplated suicide, but I did consider running away and leaving no trace.

In High School I did the things that were expected of me, I went out with the girls, I joined the Boy Scouts I tried to socialize with other students. But one thing kept coming back, I felt I was being the butt of everyones jokes.

I worked hard throughout my life. I found a job with AT&T and worked there for 30 plus years. I was never good at taking care of myself, but I could take care of others. In my mind I did not matter. That was until work sent me to therapy because of an emotional outburst I had. The therapist told me that I took on too much and never did anything for me. I needed to let my inner child out to play once in awhile. Easier said than done, but I tried.

Life went on on with it no change in my personality. Then on September 26, 2006 I had a rebirthday, I went under Gastric Bypass Surgery. I lost about 250 pounds and started to feel more confident. For the first time in my life I set aside what other people wanted me to do, and started to do the things I wanted to do. But I found with the weight loss I started to forget things in the short term. Then the most wonderful thing happened in my life, I started to talk to this wonderful woman on line.

It turned out she worked one floor above me and had for a long time. We started dating and fell in love. We married on August 18, 2007 and I’m very happy and thankful I have her in my life. She has two wonderful daughters who have a hard time understanding me and are starting me back on my downward spiral. They have no respect for me and can do nothing but criticize and joke about me and that makes me upset. They need to realize that I have 50 years of habits that I am trying to break and each time they make a comment that upsets me it’s a step back. I work with positive reinforcement not the negative that they keep sending out.

I love these two like they were my own, and I respect them but I think I deserve a little respect. I would do anything for my family and if they ask for something I will give it to them if I am able. All I ask is don’t point out the flaws in a person, point out the strengths you will go farther in your relationship.

posted by Tom Gardner in Life and have Comments Off